Today,
every inhabitant of this planet must contemplate the day
when this planet may no longer be habitable. Every man, woman, and child
lives under a nuclear sword of Damocles, hanging by the slenderest of threads,
capable of being cut at any moment by accident or miscalculation or madness.
John Fitzgerald Kennedy
There is no escape from the choice that is before us.
Shall we renounce war, or shall we bring our species to an end ?
Bertrand Russell
As a cure for the distemper of a restive electorate and a stop in the mouth
or a possibly quarrelsome press, nothing works as well as the lollipop of a foreign war.
The dodge is as old as chariots in Egypt, but by the autumn of 2003, the Bush
administration had little else with which to demonstrate either the
goodness of its heart or the worth of its existence.
From Gag Rule, On the Suppression of Dissent and the Stifling of Democracy by Lewis H. Lapham
"The UN Charter is a treaty ratified by the United States and thus part of US law,"
Cohn, who is also a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and recently co-authored the book
"Rules of Disengagement: The Politics and Honor of Military Dissent" said,
"Under the charter, a country can use armed force against another country
only in self-defense or when the Security Council approves.
Neither of those conditions was met before the United States invaded Afghanistan.
The Taliban did not attack us on 9/11. Nineteen men - 15 from Saudi Arabia - did, and there was no imminent threat that Afghanistan would attack the US or another UN member country. The council did not authorize the United States or any other country to use military force against Afghanistan.
The US war in Afghanistan is illegal."
Afghanistan: Where Empires Go to Die
The main enemy of every people is in their own country! Karl Liebknecht, addressing the anti-war movement in Germany after the outbreak of World War I
'Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger.'
-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials
"As long as there are sovereign nations possessing great power, war is inevitable.
That statement is not an attempt to say when war will come, but only that it is sure to come.
That fact was true before the atomic bomb was made. What has been changed is the destructiveness of war."
- Albert Einstein
"In no part of the Constitution is more wisdom to be found than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department. ... War is in fact the true nurse of executive aggrandizement. In war, a physical force is to be created; and it is the executive will which is to direct it. In war, the public treasures are to be unlocked; and it is the executive hand which is to dispense them. ... It is in war, finally, that laurels are to be gathered, and it is the executive brow they are to encircle. The strongest passions and most dangerous weaknesses of the human breast; ambition, avarice, vanity, the honorable or venial love of fame, are all in conspiracy against the desire and duty of peace."
Madison
"From 1945 to 2003, the United States attempted to
overthrow more than 40 foreign governments, and to crush more than
30 populist-nationalist movements fighting against intolerable
regimes. In the process, the US bombed some 25 countries, caused
the end of life for several million people, and condemned many
millions more to a life of agony and despair."
William Blum
The Constitution already says there are two ways that
the president becomes commander in chief. One, when the country is
attacked, in which case he can begin to make arrangements to defend us.
The other is if there’s a congressional declaration of war. This
distinction is also incredibly clear in Scandinavian constitutions,
which say that the executive can act to defend the country up to the
border but not one step beyond without the authorization of the
legislature." Elaine
Scarry
"American-style war doesn't work. Just ask yourself: Are there fewer terrorists or more in our world almost 13 years after the 9/11 attacks?
Are Al Qaeda-like groups more or less common? Are they more or less well organized? Do they have more or fewer members? The answers to those questions are obvious: more, more, more and more.
In fact, according to a new RAND report, between 2010 and 2013 alone, jihadist groups grew by 58 percent, their fighters doubled and their attacks nearly tripled."
Tom Engelhardt
"War is that special form of conflict in which the aim is not to resolve the points of difference but to
annihilate physically the defenders of opposing points or reduce them by force to submission."
Lewis Mumford
A senior European Commission economist has warned that a Third World War is an extremely "high probability" in coming years due to the disintegration of global capitalism.
Insurge Intelligence
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be
fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Albert
Einstein
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched,
every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who
hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This
world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of
its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.
This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the clouds of
war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron." -- Dwight Eisenhower,
April 16, 1953
It's worth noting that this is the first Veterans Day in 20 years where America does not have any troops in an active war zone.
"You would not have Socialism? Well then you will have War-war for thirty, for fifty years." So said Herzen after 1848. And war we have. If the thunder of the cannon is silent for a moment through out the world, it is but for a breathing space, it is but to begin afresh more fiercely somewhere else, while European war-a general melee of the western nations-has been threatening for years, though not one knows what the fight will be about, with what allies, or against which foe, in the name of what principles, or in whose interest.
In former times when there was war, men knew at least in what cause they were killing one another.
Peter Kropotkin
"TeleSur" - An international poll found that the United
States is ranked far in the lead as “the biggest threat to world peace
today,” far ahead of second-place Pakistan, with no one else even
close. (1/17/2015)
or (10/21/2014)
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department. Beside the objection to such a mixture to heterogeneous powers, the trust and the temptation would be too great for any one man; not such as nature may offer as the prodigy of many centuries, but such as may be expected in the ordinary successions of magistracy. War is in fact the true nurse of executive aggrandizement. In war, a physical force is to be created; and it is the executive will, which is to direct it. In war, the public treasures are to be unlocked; and it is the executive hand which is to dispense them. In war, the honours and emoluments of office are to be multiplied; and it is the executive patronage under which they are to be enjoyed. It is in war, finally, that laurels are to be gathered, and it is the executive brow they are to encircle. The strongest passions and most dangerous weaknesses of the human breast; ambition, avarice, vanity,
the honourable or venial love of fame, are all in conspiracy against the desire and duty of peace. "
James Madison
“In four separate cases since the beginning of his presidency, and for the first time in the history of modern warfare, an American president has aided service members accused or convicted of war crimes, against the advice of his own military leadership.” https://t.co/BRJuXLjbkE
Right wing governments are addicted to war, usually to expand their turf or their empire.
Looks like the US has never really won a war. The revolution produced a President much more powerful than the King we tried to overthrow,
Thae Civil War and WWII are still raging.
The battle was always about democracy vs oligopoly.
Imperialism got us the forever wars.
Racism and culture war brought them home as militarized police, the insurrection,
and the risk of government overthrow loom.
Did we learn anything from World Wars or subsequent wars in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and others ?
Although we nearly bankrupted ourselves, what was the point ?
See where your tax dollars went.
The long list of lost US wars shows deep dysfunction in US government.
An uncontrolled executive, compliant Congress and Supreme Court,
a two party system that swing like wrecking balls, media that does not support democracy,
elections rigged for a minority, a Constitution too hard to change to keep up with
deadly challenges.
Trump was an inexperienced, self-serving, racist, white nationalist, authoritarian leader, who enjoys rallies and military parades, incites violence,
lies regularly, has values that include greed that motivates a border wall to keep 'them' out, and surrounds himself with warmongers.
Timothy Snyder and others have written in recent books that he is a Fascist. So we lost WWII
as well as subsequent wars and the continuing forever wars.
In the continuing battle between oligarchy and democracy, Heather Cox Richardson
argues 'How the South Won the Civil War'.
Trump is a powerful, unchecked leader who refuses oversight and has a cult-like following.
The Presidency is more powerful than the king we sought to overthrow.
So the US has now lost every war it ever fought.
It appears, given Russian interference in elections, that traditional war is obsolete when, faster and cheaper, with little destruction, and far less expense, cyber warfare
is much more effective. Traditional armaments look to be a huge waste. Nuclear armaments as so destructive that no one should use them,
however Trump has pushed to expand the nuclear arsenal and spurned the UN ban on nuclear weapons.
The US continues to inflate a huge economic bubble,
the worlds largest military. for a declining empire.
We are mobilizing for greater war, starting another arms race with Russia, spurning long-standing international agreements,
expanding the nuclear arsenal which is on hair-trigger alert and threatening Iran.
Like other Fascists, Republicans will tell you how exceptional we are.
In reality, corporations moved manufacturing to low-wage, environmentally lax offshore countries
leaving abandoned factories across the US landscape.
China, with a population that far exceeds ours, is rapidly growing its economy as ours shrinks.
Kishore Mahbubani writes (Beyond the Age of Innocence pg 95. )
"America's relations with the 1.2 billion Muslims in the world are clearly in trouble.
If America is not careful, its relations with 1.3 billion Chinese could be heading the same way.
In strategic terms, it would be unwise for the 290 million Americans to have a difficult relationship
simultaneously with two groups of people who, combined, have a population almost ten times that of America's.
Their minds enveloped in the current mood of hubris,
it is difficult for some key American thinkers to accept the suggestion that
a little bit of prudence should be injected into American policies."
We have a government that does not respond to the wishes of the people
and directly attacks democracy. Nobody wants world war, although clearly that is where we are headed.
Republican hawks have been threatening war with Iran for years.
There is no effort to save the environment, certain to become hostile.
Our government is ready for war. This time it can be nuclear. This is not about our safety.
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved the clock again - this time to 2 minutes to nuclear midnight, saying,
"This is a dangerous time, but the danger is of our own making. Humankind has invented the implements of apocalypse ..."
Thanks to Republicans,
humanity is on an insane path to suicide with little time to change course.
Milos Zeman, president of the Czech Republic in discussion with Steve Bannon warned "Tell Trump you didn't learn from Hitler.
You can't fight on two fronts. You can't take on radical Islam and China. You will end up in the bunker, like Hitler."
"The fears of global war are well-founded. Last month, US President Donald Trump presented his new National Security Strategy,
targeting Russia and China as "revisionist powers" standing in the way of the US assertion of global hegemony,
and outlining an aggressive first-strike nuclear war policy, including against adversaries using conventional or cyber weapons.
This policy has been further fleshed out by a draft Nuclear Strategic Posture document to be unveiled by Trump later this month calling
for the development of new smaller and more "usable" nuclear weapons for deployment on battlefields in Eastern Europe and Asia,
making a full-scale global conflagration all the more likely." Fractures, Fears and Failures:
World's Ruling Elites Stare into the Abyss (1/18/2018)
"America's
relations with the 1.2 billion Muslims in the world are clearly in
trouble. If America is not careful, its relations with 1.3 billion Chinese could be heading the same way.
In strategic terms, it would be unwise for the 290 million Americans to
have a difficult relationship simultaneously with two groups of people
who, combined, have a population almost ten times that of America's.
Their minds enveloped in the current mood of hubris,
it is difficult for some key American thinkers to accept the suggestion
that a little bit of prudence should be injected into
American policies." Kishore Mahbubani: Beyond the Age of Innocence
pg 95.
All nations must come to the decision to renounce force as a final resort. If they are not prepared to do this, they will cease to exist.
Mainau, Lake Constance, 15 July 1955[2]
Weapons do not defeat an ideology.
(the crusades did not eliminate Muslims and, after 20 years of fighting in Afghanistan, we accomplished nothing.)
Religion, a powerful ally of right wing politics,
is a powerful motivator of war,
the cutting edge of empire, even the cold war,
incites violence like 9/11 or attacks on abortion clinics.
War is a last resort, a total failure of diplomacy, a waste of resources, a destroyer of the environment,
an invitation to national bankruptcy, a taker of civil liberties, an irrational activity, and nuclear technology
can easily destroy us all. Politicians like Nixon and Bush used it to win elections.
Trump, representing billionaire oligarchs, expanded the worlds largest military,
expanded the nuclear arsenal.
We spent $6 trillion on wars in the Middle East based on a pretext of lies by the Bush administration. and
(See Jane Mayers book "the Dark Side")
the pretext for the Iraq war was extracted to stop the torture.)
Earlier there was Vietnam. Similarly based on lies and a huge expense for our addiction to the military-industrial complex. (See the Pentagon Papers.)
Reagan waged dirty wars in Central America over Congressional objections,
which violated Constitutional defined power, and should have been grounds for his removal from office.
Ollie North was a war criminal.
Jimmy Carter didn’t start a war...which makes him, in the eyes of Republicans, weak.
Trump had a war cabinet that includes John Bolton, and Mike Pompeo. It looks like we are being readied for war with Iran and with North Korea..
They dream of a world-dominating empire, so the Trump administration and Republicans
are massively funding weaponry, enhancing the nuclear arsenal,
but dismantling arms control treaties, the State Department and defunding social programs.
The so-called “War on Terror” should be seen for what
it really is: a pretext for maintaining a dangerously oversized U.S. military. The two
most powerful groups in the U.S. foreign policy establishment are the
Israel lobby, which directs U.S. Middle East policy, and the
Military-Industrial-Complex, which profits from the former group’s
actions. Since George W. Bush declared the “War on Terror” in October
2001, it has cost the American taxpayer approximately 6.6 trillion
dollars and thousands of fallen sons and daughters; but, the wars have
also raked in billions of dollars for Washington’s military elite.
GARIKAI
CHENGU
Mankind must put an end to war or
war will put an end to mankind" John F. Kennedy.
the War Party is ascendant. It controls Congress. The
president is visibly, if with his usual reluctance, placing his bets on
war. The military is riding high. The end of all calls for serious Pentagon
budget cuts is clearly in sight. And more of the same is undoubtedly in
the works, no matter who wins the 2016 election." Tom
Englehardt (12/4/2014)
"Do we need weapons to fight wars ? Or do we need wars to create a market for weapons ?
After all, the economies of Europe, the United States, and Israel depend hugely on their weapons
industry. It's the one thing they haven't outsourced to China."
Arundhati Roy: Capitalism, a Ghost Story.
"One might even argue that capitalism often resolves systemic economic crises through war.
After all, a war economy with militarisation, mobilisation, full employment and jingoism
can be viewed as the ultimate solution to economic woes and social unrest.
The transition of Western democracy to oligarchy and the descent into soft fascism is under way.
Citizens will need to participate actively, rather than as passive consumers,
to demand an end to this cycle of violence from governments and to defend the assault on democratic processes.
We can only hope that British foreign secretary Sir Edward Grey's refrain on the commencement of First World War -
"The lamps are going out all over Europe, we shall not see them lit again in our life-time" - will not be repeated in ours.
But the omens are not good. As the late Eric Hobsbawm put it, the old century has not ended well."
World war 3 is coming...
"War is politics by other means" Carl von Clausewitz (1780-1831)
A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic
tyranny. -Alexander Solzhenitsyn
"The century beginning with the first world war and
running through to the trillion-dollar quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan has seen
countless demonstrations that, under modern conditions, war is almost
invariably an economic disaster for all concerned. That fact hasn’t
stopped these wars, and preparation for wars, being considered an
essential part of a national economic strategy, and it seems unlikely
to do so in the future." John
Quiggin
Of all the enemies of true liberty, war is, perhaps, the
most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every
other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and
armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the
many under the domination of the few.
In war, too, the discretionary power of the Executive is extended; its
influence in dealing out offices, honors and emoluments is multiplied;
and all the means of seducing the minds, are added to those of subduing
the force, of the people.
The same malignant aspect in republicanism may be traced in the
inequality of fortunes, and the opportunities of fraud, growing out of
a state of war, and in the degeneracy of manner and of morals,
engendered in both.
No nation can preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.
War is in fact the true nurse of executive aggrandizement. In war, a
physical force is to be created; and it is the executive will, which is
to direct it.
In war, the public treasuries are to be unlocked; and it is the
executive hand which is to dispense them. James Madison April 20, 1795
If the West had judged the then US government which
marched into Iraq without a resolution by the UN and without proof of the
existence of “WMDs“ by the same standards as today Putin, then George
W. Bush would have immediately been banned from entering the EU. The
foreign investments of Warren Buffett should have been frozen, the
export of vehicles of the brands GM, Ford, and Chrysler banned.
The American tendency to verbal and then also military escalation, the
isolation, demonization, and attacking of enemies has not proven
effective. The last successful major military action the US conducted
was the Normandy landing. Everything else – Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and
Afghanistan – was a clear failure. Moving NATO units towards the Polish
border and thinking about arming Ukraine is a continuation of a lack of
diplomacy by the military means. The
West on the wrong path: Gabor Steingart 8/8/2014
"Americans are now almost alone in believing that war
is a progressive force. There were fewer wars being waged by
nation-states in 2006 than at any time since 1945. In fact, there was
only one - the war in Iraq. Yet mired in the Iraqi morass, the United States continues
to put its faith in military power as it struggles to defeat the Iraqi
insurgency and prop up a weak government located mainly within an
American military base - the Green Zone - and shielded from Iraq's
people by American troops. As is commonplace across the Third World,
this is a government that exists only on television. The real power in
Iraq will therefore remain in the mosques." (from Geoffrey Perret's
book 'Commander in Chief')
“Naturally, the common people don’t want war… That is
understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who
determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the
people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship… the
people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is
easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked… It works
the same way in any country.” Hermann Göring
Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps,
the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of
every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and
taxes … known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of
the few.… No nation could preserve its freedom
in the midst of continual warfare.
— James Madison, Political Observations, 1795
War has taken 200 million lives in the past 100
years, costs the world
$2 trillion a year and the United States half of that. It is the top
destroyer of our natural environment and undergirds all the removal of
our civil liberties and the creation of mass surveillance. Military
spending produces fewer jobs than other government spending or even tax
cuts. Numerous top officials say it produces more enemies than it
kills. David
Swanson
The Soviet Union may be gone, but the Cold War never
really ended. This
is a nation that needs an enemy, and beneath the bright blue ceiling of
another September day thirteen years ago, a new one was established.
Our haywire economy requires a state of permanent war; we lost it for a
time when the Wall fell, but found it again when the Towers fell. The
savage irony is that those Towers came down thanks to the chesswork of
Cold Warriors who thought they could control the beast they created in
Afghanistan in their desire to undo the Soviets. By any measurable
standard, the United States of America, its people, its politics and
its profiteering ethos stand as a bent monument to that era, which
never really ended, but only metastasized into the so-called "War on
Terror." William
Rivers Pitt
Between the beginning of the Cold War in Europe and
the present war in
Afghanistan, a period has passed that included the Korean War; the
Vietnam War and the Cambodian invasion; U.S. interventions in Lebanon,
Grenada, Panama, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador (indirectly), and
Somalia (in connection with a UN operation, followed by sponsorship of
an invasion of Somalia by Ethiopia); and two invasions of Iraq and one
of Afghanistan. None except the Gulf War deserves to be called a
victory. The United States' millenarian notions of a national destiny
and the militarism that has infected American society have been
responsible for a series of wars from which Washington has gained
little or nothing, and suffered a great deal, while contributing
enormously to the misfortune of others" William Pfaff:
Manufacturing Insecurity 140
"That U.S. military budget exceeds
what the rest of the world’s nations combined spend on defense. Nor can
it be justified as militarily necessary to counter terrorists, who used
primitive $10 box cutters to commandeer civilian aircraft on 9/11. It
only makes sense as a field of dreams for defense contractors and their
allies in Washington who seized upon the 9/11 tragedy to invent a new
Cold War. Imagine their panic at the end of the old one and their glee
at this newfound opportunity.
Ike was right: Robert Scheer
"The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved its
doomsday clock up a couple of minutes to “five minutes to midnight.”
Even conservatives like George Shultz and Henry Kissinger are warning
that the nuclear threat is serious and getting more serious. In part,
the threat comes from nuclear proliferation. But a lot of the cause of
the proliferation is right here. Washington’s bellicose, aggressive
militarism is causing proliferation." Noam Chomsky: What We Say Goes.
...Some women are, of course, as violent as almost
any man. But speaking of averages -- central tendencies, as the statisticians call them --we can have little
doubt that we would all be safer if the world's weapons systems were
controlled by average women instead of by average men. The
Tangled Web: Melvin Konner. pg 126.
"Blessed are the peacemakers." (Matthew 5:9)
"Love one another as I have loved you." (John 15:12)
"As Jesus was arrested in the Garden of Gethsemane,
one of his followers drew a sword and struck the servant of the High
Priest. Jesus immediately said to him, "Put your sword back into its
place; for all who take the sword will perish by the sword. (Mathew
26:52)"
"War is just a
racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is
not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group
knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few
at the expense of the masses. . . " Excerpt from a speech
delivered in 1933 by
General Smedley Darlington Butler, USMC. General Butler
was the recipient of two
Congressional Medals of Honor - one of only two Marines so honored.
"I spent 33 years in the Marines. Most of my time being a
high-class muscle man for Big business, for Wall Street and the
bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism. I helped purify
Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in
1909-1912. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for
American oil interests in 1914. I brought light to the Dominican
Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Haiti and
Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenue
in. I helped in the rape of half a dozen Central American republics for
the benefit of Wall Street...." - Smedley D. Butler (1881-1940) Major General
(U.S. Marine Corps)
"I believe that the killing of human beings in a war is no
better than common murder; but so long as nations lack the
determination to abolish war through common action and find means of
solving their disputes and safeguarding their interests by peaceful
arrangements according to existing laws, they will continue to consider
it necessary to prepare for war. They will feel compelled to engage in
the manufacture of even the most detestable weapons in their fear that
they may lag behind in the general arms race. Such an approach can only
lead to war, and warfare today would mean universal annihilation of
human beings.
There is little point, therefore, in opposing the
manufacture of specific weapons; the only solution is to abolish both
war and the threat of war. That is the goal toward which we should
strive. We must be determined to reject all activities which in any way
contradict this goal. This is a harsh demand for any individual who is
conscious of his dependence upon society; but it is not an impossible
demand.
Gandhi, the greatest political genius of our time, indicated
the path to be taken. He gave proof of what sacrifice man is capable
once he has discovered the right path. His work in behalf of India’s
liberation is living testimony to the fact that man’s will, sustained
by an indomitable conviction, is more powerful than material forces
that seem insurmountable." Einstein on Politics, Rowe and
Schulmann.
In ways big and small, direct and indirect, crude
and subtle, war - the quintessential government activity - has been the
mother's milk for the nourishment of a growing tyranny in this country,
and it remains so today." Robert Higgs: Neither Liberty or Safety pg
139 (2007)
“But now that war has become seemingly total and
seemingly permanent,
the free sport of kings has become the forced and internecine business
of people, and diplomatic codes of honor between nations have
collapsed. Peace is no longer serious; only war is serious. Every man
and every nation is either friend or foe, and the idea of enmity
becomes mechanical, massive, and without genuine passion. When
virtually all negotiation aimed at peaceful agreement is likely to be
seen as 'appeasement,' if not treason, the active role of the diplomat
becomes meaningless; for diplomacy becomes merely a prelude to war or
an interlude between wars, and in such a context the diplomat is
replaced by the warlord......In other words 'the morale of the State
Department is so broken that its finest men flee from it, and advise
others to flee.' C Wright Mills
If we do not act, we shall surely be dragged down
the long, dark, and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who
possess power without compassion, might without morality, and strength
without sight. Martin Luther King about the Vietnam War
"Critics of the arms race have focused on the strong
belief held by weapons professionals, that nuclear weapons will never
be used. Robert
J. Lifton, the great antinuclear psychiatrist, has talked about
it s a form of denial." Hugh
Gusterson quoted in Loving This Planet, Helen Caldicott
It is estimated that the world will spend a combined
US $1 trillion on nuclear weapons from 2011 to 2021. At roughly a $100 billion a
year.., we are spending about forty times more a year on unnecessary nuclear weapons
than on necessary UN expenses. All these confirm that humanity at large
is behaving absurdly in many ways in managing our planet.
Kishore Mahbubani: the
Great Convergence pg 108
Republicans are always ready to
go to war, but not to pay for them. They claim
to be fiscally responsible, but cutting taxes and putting the cost
of the war on the tab, financed by third world countries, puts an
unconscionable burden on the next generation. The War in Iraq was
financed by supplementals. Joe Stiglitz has
excellent suggestions for reform in his book
The Three Trillion Dollar War: (He has since revised his
estimate: it was a Four Trillion
Dollar War.)
War is profitable. It is also regressive
since many people suffer for the benefit of a very small group. (See Empire.)
The US has
the
world's largest military. It is
bankrupting us, it is motivating a new arms race, it is terrorizing
many countries of the world, and it is clearly a making us less
safe. We have, in our boastful, arrogant claim to be the world's
superpower, created determined enemies and no one will be surprised
if we are ourselves subject to attack from outside. Most US
tax dollars go to pay for empire.
The US military is often a
security force for multi-national corporations.
These
corporations are, by Supreme Court
ruling, dedicated to making money. They are not particularly
patriotic, so will offshore jobs to the lowest wage, least
regulated, lowest tax, lax environmental countries (or states if
they absolutely must be in this country) or a combination of
countries that maximizes their profits. Their profits are not
repatriated to avoid U.S. taxes. That is how the market
propels us to the bottom. That is the Republican
agenda.
Lessons
We should learn from our pointless wars: Iraq,
Afghanistan, Vietnam,
... They have been horrendously expensive in life, limbs, and treasure
for which there not only has been no benefit, but has left chaos and
destruction behind. Pretexts for these wars were lies from
ideologues.
War on an abstraction, like 'terrorism',
is going to be endless....and pointless.
Most U.S. wars have had a religious
component: (godless Communism,
Islamophobia) which is one of the reasons that Republicans favor war. It also explains why
we excused Israel for development of a
nuclear arsenal and why the US cannot stand down its nuclear weapons.
Secrecy suppresses public
discussion, and enables war based on false pretexts. Harsh punishment
for whistle-blowers makes it rare that the public can find out what
government is really doing. Daniel Elsberg
revealed the lies underlying the pretext for war in Vietnam. Chelsea
Manning is serving -- years in prison for -- Edward Snowden made
surveillance of everyone public. They are heroes who should be rewarded
for their patriotism. They took huge personal risks to make the truth
public.
Well connected Republicans made
a lot of money
from the Iraq War. KBR, Blackwater,
Dyncorp, and others profited from the privatization
of formerly
military functions.
James Risen in his book,
Pay Any Price, points out "... at
least $11.7 billion of the approximately $20 billion ...sent to Iraq
from New York is either unaccounted for or has simply disappeared.
War
profiteering should be a crime. Any attempt to investigate
widespread corruption by Iraq contractors was voted down by Republicans.
You can get an idea from this movie, Iraq
For Sale, which you can watch on-line.
How much longer can we afford to be the "World's
Policeman"? We are spending over $500B per year for defense, homeland
security and nation building. Investments we are making in developing
new democracies are draining our domestic programs such as health care,
stifling the education of our young people and limiting research and
development in valuable commercial technologies. The largest
corporations selling to our government are no more than extensions of
our government in the cloak of industry. They are not in the business
of making money for the stockholder. They are in the business of
spending money for the government. As a result they are some of the
poorest growth stocks on Wall Street. Recent consolidation in the
Defense Industrial Complex has dramatically reduced competition. Only
public laws mandating a twenty per cent allocation of Federal Contract
Funding to small business have kept diversification in the mix. Even
then, much of the moneys that flow to small business go through a
select group of large business prime contractors who add their
respective overhead and general administrative expense to the small
business cost and pass it on to the government. Ken Larson
from the book, "Odyssey of Armaments, My Journey Through the Defense
Industrial Complex"
The US is
spending more on its military than the
rest of the world combined.
It is time the US broke its dependency on war. As a jobs
program it is, to say the least, counterproductive, although that is
what sustains it. It seems the US is not only providing security
for multi-national corporations, it is building an empire.
It is profitable. It will self-destruct.
Iraq demonstrated that we learned
nothing from Vietnam.
These wars were alike in that they were based on lies, and each was a
pointless failure...except for the war profiteers. They were
expanded by Presidents who were
surrounded by sycophants, their actual policy was secret
and quite the opposite of what the public was told, outside contractors
who valued their jobs could not disagree and neither could apparatchik
insiders, media was complicit or misinformed,
public dissent was suppresed and so were civil
liberties.
When Bush took office, Republicans
no longer could use the big red scare as a pretext for war. Russia no
longer appeared to be a credible threat, so it became necessary to demonize the Muslim world. There was a serious
concern that peace
would break out. But a religious war,
for some people, became
possible. This could be a new crusade, and invading Iraq
had the further benefit of acquiring vast new oil wealth. Afghanistan
had the potential to be a new pipeline route, as it turned out, it also
has prospered as the drug trade has
flourished. Real men, neocons who mostly never served, wanted to invade Iran.
There was the possibility that peace
would break out, but W solved that problem.
Since the US has been mostly deindustrialized, it is important to
preserve our remaining industries: armaments and the military. Jobs in
the military have many benefits that are increasingly unavailable in
the private sector including health care, clothing, weapons, food,
housing, training, and job security. Industry has moved to low-wage
countries, so the military is the only job choice for many.
So early in his administration, Bush
and his team worked on
various pretexts for war in Iraq. Although
'intelligence' agencies did not agree that Iraq was a threat, through a
process of bureaucratic interference, media
manipulation, and
intimidation, the Neocons were able to arrive at their desired
conclusions.
Interestingly, these were some of the same people who, in the Reagan
administration, told us that Russia was 10 feet tall and required a
vast new arms buildup. It didn't seem to matter that some were
convicted Iran/contra felons,
they were promoted to senior positions.
Immense new debt was
required to fund all of this, but, as Cheney remarked, they had 'won'
the election, and they had the right.
Still, as Chicago economists pointed out, it would take "a new
pearl harbor" to make this dream a reality. Then 9/11
provided the crisis needed to implement the Bush agenda. The mysterious
outbreak of militarized anthrax powder also helped. Now there was
justification for the Patriot Act, for
the Military Commissions Act, for revoking the FISA Act, for curtailing
civil liberties, for thorough
new surveillance both of foreign and
domestic activities, for a hugely profitable privatized national
security state, and for a
breathtaking expansion of Presidential
power.
The AUMF
made the entire world a battlefield, and granted the President
dictatorial power. Obama continued it.
Bush used these new powers to create
secret prisons, imprison people using renditions, and to extract
information from prisoners using torture.
This required abrogating quaint international agreements like the
Geneva Conventions, and thumbing their noses at international law. With his new war
powers, Bush in many ways acted as if he were above the law. It
is difficult to find justification for it in the Constitution, but the
Bushies announced their intention to remake the Middle East. What is
the Constitution but another piece of paper ?
Not to miss any opportunity though, by expanding NATO
into the former eastern European countries, Russia again was made to
feel threatened. To be sure, it took a new expansion of the 'Star Wars' program to place a ring of
missiles around Russia thus assuring that there would be a provocation
for their action. Sure enough, they are promising new military action
in response. Media announced that Russia invaded Georgia, when
according to Gorbachev, just exactly the reverse had happened. Putin
has opined that the war in Georgia was staged for the US Presidential
elections...a September surprise.
As Russia and Georgia clashed, Elliott Kalan, producer for the
Daily Show with Jon Stewart wrote:
"Luckily, John McCain made it clear he wouldn't have
let this war pass us by. If McCain was in charge we'd be attacking
Russia right now, and maybe China, Iran, and Italy just to be
safe. That's because he knows the only way to get America back into
fighting shape is to keep America fighting. Then, we'll be so busy
battling that we won't have time to worry about anything else, and
those problems will go away. It's a solution that's beautiful in its
simplicity. McCain's proven he's the only candidate who has his
priorities straight. We may not have enough jobs, gasoline, or medicine
to go around, but under President McCain there'll be war enough for
everybody !
Although the Ballistic Missiles
(star wars) weren't really working, the Bushies were keen to deploy it
in Eastern Europe. Putin went ballistic, and now we are seeing Russian
military preparations with Venezuela, and the Russians have helped Iran
to bring their nuclear reactor on-line.
We were promised 'endless war' and election of Republicans
will pretty much guarantee it. We now have two chances to engage
in a new world war, one from the Middle East, and another with Russia.
China, as it grows economically stronger, could have potential also.
Time is long overdue to engage the
conversation about how to move from a permanent war economy to a
permanent peace economy. Seymour
Melman’s 2003 article “In the Grip of
a Permanent War Economy”
Ex-Army official says fired over KBR audit 17
Jun 2008 A former
high-ranking civilian U.S. Army official says he was fired in 2004 when
he questioned the Iraq war expenditures of military contractor KBR. The
official, Charles Smith, said he was ousted from his position as the
top civilian overseer of KBR's lucrative contract to supply services to
U.S. troops when he refused to sign off on more than $1 billion in
questionable spending, The New York Times reported Tuesday.
By announcing a policy that we would 'remake the middle east'
Bush assured that there will be a new generation of dedicated soldiers
for Islam ready to fight at all costs for a new crusade. Religious war,
resource war, cultural war have all been enlisted to be sure that the
US can remain a militarized state with a strong man President. By
taking on war powers, Bush demonstrated that the President can
disappear people, torture would be routine
policy, that secret prisons
are possible, and that additional wars can be waged at the Presidents
will. Some traditional American commitments are quaint: such as the
Geneva Conventions, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, real elections, and the Constitution. Habeas
Corpus may have been the rule since 1210 AD, but, in the face of new
threats, why worry about it.
But that's not all. We all felt a loss when the cold war
ended. There almost were budget cuts for the military, and we
contemplated the possibility of a 'peace dividend'. Much of the war
profiteering elite might have suffered a loss too. Bush has taken care
of these concerns as well. First, even though the
Star Wars program was
known to be a dysfunctional money pit, he revived this program and
fought hard to deploy it to sensitive countries in central Europe. As
their surrounding countries started to join NATO, and star wars
installations began to be deployed, Russia again feels threatened. So
you can be assured that the arms race will continue, the
Military-Industrial complex will remain strong. (Get over it, you will
not get health care, better education, pensions, good
transportation, better infrastructure, or any real domestic
improvements. Don't whine about the elections
that are now so
thoroughly rigged..)
* Our never ending "war on terror" is designed to do
just what James Madison warned of... destroy our freedom a little bit
at a time. Just look at the laws that are being passed these
days. Congress passed (September 2006) the "Military
Commissions Act of 2006" into law. Military Commissions Act
Rep. Nancy Johnson, Chris Shays, Rob Simmons and Sen. Lieberman all
voted for the Military Commissions Act and it passed. It allows Bush to
imprison anyone he chooses and abuse them as he sees fit. It places
Bush above the law, our first American monarch. http://informationclearinghouse.info/article15169.htm
Support the campaign to
repeal the overbroad "authorization for use of military force", adopted
by a panicky congress in 2001, which gives Bush carte blanche to start
wars anywhere.
U.S. FLUNKS THE GLOBAL PEACE TEST; RANKS 96 OUT OF 121
COUNTRIES
The Economist Intelligence Unit, in conjunction with an
international team of academics and peace experts, has compiled an
innovative new Global Peace Index which ranks 121 nations according to
their relative peacefulness. The Global Peace Index is composed of 24
indicators, ranging from a nation’s level of military expenditure to
its relations with neighboring countries and the level of respect for
human rights. The index has been tested against a range of potential
“drivers” or determinants of peace—including levels of democracy and
transparency, education and material wellbeing…
http://democracyrising.us/content/view/947/164/
(2/14/2007)
The Vermont State Legislature made headlines yesterday when lawmakers
passed resolutions in both the House and Senate calling for the
immediate and orderly withdrawal of US troops from Iraq.
Vermont has
lost more soldiers per capita than any other state in the nation, and
is the first state to pass a resolution calling for troop withdrawal.
The majority of Democrats supported the resolution. Most Republicans
opposed it, contesting a passage that suggested the presence of US
troops would not bring stability to Iraq, or security to the United
States.
The president of the United States, the prime minister of the
United Kingdom, and the prime minister of Israel must acknowledge and
accept responsibility for the willful use of uranium munitions-their
own "dirty bombs"-resulting in adverse health and environmental
effects. It also leaves behind a fine radioactive dust with a half-life
of 4.5 billion years.
Handing taxpayer money to the Permanent War Economy
By Mary Beth Sullivan
Bath, Maine
In the words of the great economist and engineer
Seymour Melman,
we live in a “permanent war economy.” Since the end of
World War II, the federal government has spent more than half its tax
dollars on past, current and future military operations. It is
the largest single sustaining activity of the government. Melman
pointed out 25 years ago that, at the time, the Pentagon was paying for
37,000 industrial firms, which oversaw over 100,000 subcontractors.
Then and now, Pentagon contracts come with 1) guaranteed profits
(because the products are typically sold before they are produced); 2)
institutionalized cost-escalation (cost overruns are business-as-usual);
and 3) products that are neither goods nor services the citizenry
produces and consumes. Balance sheet calculations are not
relevant to weapons manufacturers and military corporations. The
Pentagon is not playing by the economic rules of producing goods,
selling them for a profit, then using the profit for further investment
and production. The managers at the Pentagon know their financial
capital – American’s taxes – is a cash cow waiting to be milked.
Or should we say bilked? American’s hand over their
hard-earned dollars to the deciders in Washington who protect the
permanent war economy. The military industrial complex has
tentacle that spread throughout the Congressional districts in the
country. Military installations, private contractors and weapons
manufacturers employ people to build cluster bombs, unnecessary war
planes, naval destroyers, the next generation of nuclear weapons, “kill
vehicles” for space missiles, and more efficient spy satellites.
Congress continues to appropriate funds to create weapons systems that
range from being obsolete, to those having no hope of ever functioning,
to those promising to kill more efficiently, to those promising to
allow the U.S. to be the “Masters of Space” through military domination
by space-based weapons.
This work often provides union jobs and health benefits (both
of which are “endangered species” in America) and the false hope of job
security. Local communities defend the jobs (if not the
corporations) when there is a threat of loss, knowing that America has
few other industrial jobs, and the service sector doesn’t provide the
same standard of living.
Meanwhile, military contractors’ CEO compensation is
unregulated and obscene.[1] The door revolves between the halls of
Congress and the military industrial complex’s “private sector”
boardrooms. [Question: If a CEO’s compensation comes
primarily from the taxpayers of America, can it still be stated that he
works for the “private” sector?] It’s a sweet deal as long as
Americans stay afraid of an enemy, there is minimal oversight of cost
overruns or failed weapons systems, and questions of ethics, morality,
and effective foreign policy are ignored.
Lax oversight is a tired, old issue. Melman reported
twenty-five years ago that in 1978, the Pentagon’s top management
misplaced, lost track of, or misappropriated $30 billion in one of its
“auxiliary operations.” News of the missing funds got almost no
public or media notice. There was no public outcry. Fast
forward to $100 billion lost by Paul Bremer in the early months of the
war in Iraq. Again, the loss of this obscene amount received
little media attention and no public outcry. Meanwhile, those of
us who bear witness to the plight of the homeless people in our
communities, who join the growing numbers of citizens without health
insurance, who watch our elderly friends make choices between food and
medicine to stay alive, who watch the states struggle to cut basic
support from our vulnerable neighbors… faithfully make the lists (with
no small amount of outrage) to educate our neighbors about what we
could have done with that $100 billion Paul Bremer chose to toss to the
winds.
The Democrats in Congress have begun oversight hearings on
some aspects of the abuse of federal dollars by military contractors
since we invaded Iraq. Unfortunately, their response to President
Bush’s next appropriation to continue the occupation of Iraq is to
recommend $5 billion more than the $93 billion requested! [2]
A project the Democrats will not investigate is also one of
the clearest examples of continued funding of a failed system.
President Bush deployed the missile “defense” system in Alaska and
California in spite of the fact that the series of ($100 million each)
tests prove they don’t work! There is controversy about
whether Boeing misled Congress in its report about the actual results
of testing the “kill vehicle” component of the system, and recently
questions emerged about whether the oversight report by the General
Accounting Office is completely credible. Nevertheless, the
systems and the infrastructure are in place to keep the research,
development, and production dollars flowing for the next two decades –
effectiveness be damned! The current estimates say this system
will cost $250 billion over twenty years.
A recent Military Industrial Complex scandal appeared in the
media in December 2006 criticizing – of all groups – the U.S. Coast
Guard! It’s modernization program called Deepwater has been
called “a mistake of colossal proportions, with …billions in cost
overruns, suspended programs and ships that are downright unsafe to be
at sea…” The contractor is a joint venture between Lockheed
Martin and Northrup Grumman, two of the most profitable military
corporations in the world. (Robert Stevens, the CEO of Lockheed
Martin was compensated $15.7 million in 2006). The estimated $17
billion cost of Deepwater ballooned to $24 billion, and “not one of the
24 ships, 12 lanes and eight unmanned vehicles that were supposed to
have been delivered by now is available for service.” In
editorializing about this fiasco, our local newspaper reported that the
private contractors routinely ignored or overruled the concerns of
Coast Guard engineers; that the Coast Guard did not seek help from
Congress for oversight fearing they would lose funding; “but the
biggest error was ceding almost total control of this vital national
security effort to the companies that make money from it.”
The corruption and depletion of our resources – indeed our
souls – must come to an end. Time is long overdue to engage the
conversation about how to move from a permanent war economy to a
permanent peace economy. Seymour Melman’s 2003 article “In the
Grip of a Permanent War Economy” clarifies this reality (http://www.swans.com/library/art9/melman01.html).
He then tells the story of the New York City Transit Authority effort
to spend between $3 billion to $4 billion on subway cars. City
government put out a request for bids and not a single American company
responded. The industrial base in this country no longer
manufactures what is needed to maintain, improve, or build our
infrastructure. Instead, the city contracted with companies in
Japan and Canada to build its subway cars. Melman estimated that
such a contract could have generated, directly and indirectly, about
32,000 jobs in the U.S. Imagine an American production facility
and labor force that could deliver six new subway cars each week, 300
subway cars each year, replacing in 20 year cycles the 6,000 rail car
fleet of the New York subway system. Why can’t that happen here
in the U.S.A.?
Another story: A shipyard in the town of Ringkobing,
Denmark went broke in 1999. Vestas Wind Systems, a private
company, moved in and converted the facilities to make windmills.
In April of 2001, Business Week Online reported that the company had
doubled its initial workforce, and that all the shipyard workers had
become employed making windmills. Vestas leads a cluster of companies
that have made Denmark, with a population of 5 million people, the
world’s top producer and exporter of windmills. Wind industry
supplies about 13 percent of Denmark’s power, and in 2001 controlled
about 50 percent of the $4.5 billion global wind market. The
company sees that wind is gaining ground over other renewable sources,
and may very well become the green power of choice for the 21st Century.
It is possible to create industries, here on our own soil,
that build something other than weapons. Other countries
can figure out how to make consumer goods that serve the greater
community, keep their workforce productive, and work to prevent global
warming. The U.S. can surely do the same.
It is time for us in the peace and justice communities, in
our religious and spiritual communities, in our workplaces, on the
streets of our neighborhoods, and walking through the halls of Congress
to demand to put an end to the permanent war corporate welfare
state. It is time that we build an industrial base in our country
that rebuilds our physical infrastructure (roads, bridges, public
transportation, schools), pays a living wage, and provides for the
health and welfare of our citizens. Time is long overdue to
convert from a war economy to a peace economy. Read Seymour
Melman. His research will help show the way.
Mary Beth Sullivan is a social worker in Maine working
as a community organizer with homeless people. She also serves as
the administrative assistant for the Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
[1] See
http://www.faireconomy.org/reports/2006/ExecutiveExcess2006.pdf
for the Institute for Policy Study’s 13th Annual CEO’s Compensation
Survey titled “Defense and Oil Executives Cash in on Conflict.” It
notes that since 9/11, the average pay for the 34 top military
contractors has increased from $3.6 million to $7.2 million.
While the average army private makes $25,000/year, the average military
contractor CEO makes $7.7 million.
[2] On March 23 the Democrats voted in the House to give
George W. Bush $124 billion in the Iraq occupation supplemental.
Research and facts about biological weapons.
"Nationally, very few organizations actively file FOIA requests on
biological and chemical weapons issues. Some government agencies
attempt to conceal potentially controversial materials by exaggerating
exemptions - trying to keep secrets that they are not legally entitled
to maintain. This unwarranted secrecy is detrimental to biological
weapons control and makes our job more difficult."
Thanks to the radio/TV program “Democracy Now,” hundreds of
thousands of people across our country recently heard and watched a
sneak-preview excerpt from the documentary film based on my book War
Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.
Narrated by Sean Penn, and produced by the superb independent
filmmakers at the Media Education Foundation, War Made Easy
is a powerful indictment of the current U.S. warfare state and a call
to action. I’m hoping it will inspire a nationwide surge of
antiwar activism.
The 73-minute film reaches into the Orwellian memory hole to exhume
remarkable archival footage. It exposes a 50-year pattern of deception
that has dragged the U.S. into one war after another. And the film
zeroes in on the current historical moment – the techniques of
propaganda that are preventing an end to a horrific war effort based on
lies.