Donald Trump has divined, has figured out what are the essential pillars of U.S. global power
that have sustained Washington’s hegemony for the past 70 years and he seems to be setting out to demolish each one of those pillars one by one.
He’s weakened the NATO alliance; he’s weakened our alliances with Asian allies along the Pacific littoral.
He’s proposing to cut back on the scientific research which has given the United States — its military industrial complex —
a cutting edge, a leading edge in critical new weapons systems since the early years of the Cold War.
And he’s withdrawing the United States, almost willfully, from its international leadership, most spectacularly with the Paris Climate Accord
but also very importantly with the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Alfred W McCoy
... if the American people do not find a way to choose democracy over empire -
at least our imperial venture will end not with a nuclear bang but a financial whimper.
From the present vantage point, it certainly seems a daunting
challenge for any president (or Congress) from either party even to begin the
task of dismantling the military-industrial complex, ending the pall of ¨national security¨ secrecy
and the ¨black budget¨ that make public oversight of what our government
does impossible, and bringing the president´s secret army, the CIA,
under democratic control. It´s evident that Nemesis - in Greek mythology the goddess of vengeance, the punisher of hubris and
arrogance - is already a visitor in our country, simply biding her time before she makes
her presence known. Chalmers Johnson´s book Dismantling the Empire, America´s Last Best Hope.(2010)
“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we
create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality – judiciously, as
you will – we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can
study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors
. . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” (Ron
Suskind, NYTimes Magazine, Oct. 17, 2004). See here.
"...this empire that we’ve created really has an emperor,
and it’s not the president of this country. The President
serves, you know, for a short period of time. But it doesn't really
matter whether we have a Democrat or a Republican in the White
House or running Congress; the empire goes on, because it’s
really run by what I call the corporatocracy, which is a group of
men who run our biggest corporations. This isn’t a conspiracy
theory. They don’t need to conspire. They all know what
serves their best interest. But they really are the equivalent of
the emperor, because they do not serve at the wish of the people,
they’re not democratically elected, they don’t serve
any limited term. They essentially answer to no one, except their
own boards, and most corporate CEOs actually run their boards,
rather than the other way around. And they are the power behind
this." From John Perkins interview
with Amy Goodman June 5, 2007
despite a range of setbacks, no one in
Washington’s power elite -- Senators Rand Paul and Bernie Sanders being
the exceptions that prove the rule -- seems to have the slightest urge
to abandon the role of sole superpower or even to back off it in any
significant way." Michael
Klare
" There is ... a huge tacit conspiracy between the U.S. government, its agencies
and its multinational corporations, on the one hand, and local business and military cliques in the Third World,
on the other, to assume complete control of these countries and "develop" them on a joint venture basis.
The military leaders of the Third World were carefully nurtured by the U.S. security establishment
to serve as the "enforcers" of this joint venture partnership, and they have been duly supplied
with machine guns and the latest data on methods of interrogation of subversives."
Edward S. Herman
"From 1945 to 2003, the United States attempted to
overthrow more than 40 foreign governments, and to crush more than
30 populist-nationalist movements fighting against intolerable
regimes. In the process, the US bombed some 25 countries, caused
the end of life for several million people, and condemned many
millions more to a life of agony and despair."
William Blum
Britain and France have some thirteen overseas bases between them, Russia has nine, and
various other countries have one - in all, there are probably thirty overseas bases owned by non-U.S./
countries. The United States, by contrast, has roughly eight hundred, plus agreements granting it access
to still other foreign sites. Dozens of countries host U.S. bases. Those that refuse are nevertheless
surrounded by them.
How to Hide an Empire: Daniel Immerwarh
The persistence of donor-backed Republican hawkishness remains an obstacle to national development — of industrial capacity and widely shared solidarity — that would strengthen America’s defenses and ennoble its culture. The monsters that menace us don’t lurk abroad.
Hawks Are Standing in the Way of a New Republican Party (2/5/2022)
"...for an empire to be born, a Republic first has to die." Tony
Judt
Jared Diamond wrote about the collapse of earlier
civilizations to great acclaim and brisk sales, in a nimbus of
unimpeachable respectability. The stories he told about bygone cultures
gone to seed were, above all, dramatic. No reviewers or other
intellectual auditors dissed him for suggesting that empires inevitably
run aground on the shoals of resource depletion, population overshoot,
changes in the weather, and the diminishing returns of complexity. Yet
these are exactly the same problems that industrial-technocratic
societies face today, and those of us who venture to discuss them are
consigned to a tin-foil-hat brigade, along with the UFO abductees and
Bigfoot trackers. This is unfortunate but completely predictable, since
the sunk costs in all the stuff of daily life (freeways, malls, tract
houses) are so grotesquely huge that letting go of them is strictly
unthinkable. We're stuck with a very elaborate setup that has no
future; but we refuse to consider the consequences. So messengers are
generally unwelcome. (attributed to James
Howard Kunstler.)
What has emerged from Trump’s rants is a self-contradictory vision of a
Fortress America with tightly controlled borders that invites foreign
conflict by maintaining a provocative, overextended presence abroad.
This is hardly a recipe for international stability. What might have
been an overdue debate on the limits of interventionist overreach has
not materialized, while Trump has been dismissed as a dangerous
isolationist. A debate on American intervention is as necessary as
ever." NY Review of Books.
The abandonment of empire resulted partly from the realization that empire
was almost always an economic drain on the imperial powers and that countries that did not indulge in
empire, like Sweden, found it much easier to develop than the great powers.
Kenneth E. Boulding, The World as a Total System.
Government and corporate elites were partners in the business of imperialism: empires gave government leaders power and prestige, and gave corporate leaders power and wealth. Corporations ran the real business of empire while government leaders
fabricated noble excuses for the wars that were required to keep that business going. Beyond Left & Right: Escaping the Matrix
“The costs of empire are in general distributed over the society as a whole, while its profits revert to a few within. Noam Chomsky
"The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) took control of the ideological foundations of the American empire,
encompassing the corporate, banking, political, foreign policy, military, media, and academic elite
of the nation into a generally cohesive overall world view.
By altering one's ideology to that of promoting such an internationalist agenda,
the big money that was behind it would ensure one's rise through government, industry, academia and media.
There are divisions within the elite, predicated on the basis of how to use American imperial power,
where to use it, on what basis to justify it, and other various methodological differences.
The divide amongst elites was never on the questions of: should we use American imperial power,
why has America become an Empire, or should there even be an empire?
If one takes such considerations to heart and questions these concepts,
be it within the foreign policy establishment, intelligence, military, academia, finance,
corporate world, or media; chances are, such a person is not a member of the CFR."
Andrew Gavin Marshall
We never voted to become an empire. It was a slow expansion that
people gradually got accustomed. It has all but bankrupted us.
Without a radical change, we will be a Fascist state, if we aren't already.
Staying Bush's course meant the end of
our republic, rejection of international law, and it confirmed
our path to empire.
It should now be obvious that we are a lot less safe now. War
has become increasingly more destructive and our
fate could be worse than those which have gone before. We are, as
Noam
Chomsky points out, on a path to an "Armageddon of our own
making". See Chalmers Johnson's "Republic or Empire" in the
January, 2007 issue of Harpers Magazine or his book trilogy:
Blowback; The Sorrows of Empire; and Nemesis. (Links below.)
History shows the likely fate of empires is destruction.
The American empire is coming to an end. The nation has lost the power and respect needed to induce allies
in Europe, Latin America, Asia, and Africa to do its bidding. Add the mounting destruction caused by climate change
and you have a recipe for an emerging dystopia. Overseeing this descent at the highest levels of the federal and state governments
is a motley collection of imbeciles, con artists, thieves, opportunists, and warmongering generals.
Chris Hedges, America: The Farewell Tour pg 294:
"... to maintain our empire abroad requires resources and
commitments that will inevitably undercut our domestic democracy
and in the end produce a military dictatorship or its civilian
equivalent. The founders of our nation understood this well and
tried to create a form of government - a republic - that would
prevent this from occurring. But the combination of huge standing
armies, almost continuous wars, military Keynesianism, and ruinous
military expenses have destroyed our republican structure in favor
of an imperial presidency. We are on the cusp of losing our
democracy for the sake of keeping our empire. Once a nation is
started down that path, the dynamics that apply to all empires come
into play - isolation, overstretch, the uniting of forces
opposed to imperialism, and bankruptcy. Nemesis stalks our life as
a free nation." pg 279. Chalmers
Johnson's: Nemesis.
"The United States maintains around 800 military bases in more than 80 countries and territories." This is an absurd waste of money and resources! The U.S. MUST get out of other countries ASAP.https://t.co/45tWe4jchkpic.twitter.com/xjzCOWTETC
...in this effort to eliminate political violence
they inspire just what they claim to be combating by suggesting that
world peace is gained by the forcible spread of American ideology.
Imperialism Destroys the Constitutional Republic
The common view that internal freedom makes for humane and
moral international behavior is supported neither by historical evidence nor
by reason. The United States itself has a long history of imposing
oppressive and terrorist regimes in regions of the world within the
reach of its power, such as the Caribbean and Central American sugar
and banana republics (Trujillo in the Dominican Republic and the
Somozas in Nicaragua were long-lived progeny of U.S. intervention and
selection). Since World War II. with the great extension of U.S. power,
it has borne a heavy responsibility for the spread of a plague of
neofascism, state terrorism, torture and repression throughout large
parts of the underdeveloped world. The United States has globalized the
"banana republic." This has occurred despite some modest ideological
strain because these developments serve the needs of powerful and
dominant interests, state and private, within the United States
itself." The
Washington Connection and Third World Fascism: by Noam Chomsky and
Edward S. Herman
U.S. global power, as presently conceived by the
overwhelming majority of the U.S. establishment, is unsustainable. To
place American power on a firmer footing requires putting it on a more
limited footing. Despite the lessons of Iraq, this is something
that American policymakers - Democrat and Republican, civilian and
military - still find extremely difficult to think about." Anatol
Lieven.
...how often do empires end well, really ? They live
vampirically by feeding off others until, sooner of later, they
begin to feed on themselves, to suck their own blood, to hollow
themselves out. Soon or later, they find themselves, as in our
case, economically stressed and militarily extended in wars they
can't afford to win or lose. The
United States of Fear: Tom
Englehardt p183.
"Why should the enormous American military and political
operational centers built in Germany during the past 50 years still
exist? There no longer is a cold war with Russia, or anyone else,
that lends logic to these facilities. Today we find they are used
to eavesdrop on the German chancellor and her government, and on
the German (and other European) peoples – and undoubtedly to
collect economic and industrial intelligence as well." William
Pfaff
Chalmers Johnson video (about an hour.)
Alone in the history of the world, the United States has a
program for global supremacy. It can be found in the 2002 National
Security Strategy (NSS) of the United States and in the governing
doctrine of the United States military: "full-spectrum dominance."
(from Geoffrey Perret's book 'Commander in Chief')
"Empire: nation-state that dominates
other nation-states and exhibits one or more of the following
characteristics: 1) exploits resources from the lands it dominates,
2) consumes large quantities of resources—amounts that are
disproportionate to the size of its population relative to those of
other nations, 3) maintains a large military that enforces its
policies when more subtle measures fail, 4) spreads its language,
literature, art, and various aspects of its culture throughout its
sphere of influence, 5) taxes not just its own citizens, but also
people in other countries, and 6) imposes its own currency on the
lands under its control.
This definition of “Empire”
was formulated in meetings I held with students at a number of
universities during my book tour in 2005 and 2006. Almost without
exception, the students arrived at the following conclusion: The
United States exhibits all the characteristics of a global empire.
Addressing each of the above points... "
The Secret History of the
American Empire: John Perkins.
"If it were necessary to give the briefest definition of
imperialism we should have to say that imperialism is the monopoly
stage of capitalism" Lenin
Documentary Filmmaker John Pilger on Struggles for
Freedom in Israel-Palestine, Diego Garcia, Latin America and South
Africa
The renowned investigative journalist and documentary filmmaker
John Pilger
has spent the better part of his life documenting American empire
and the
resistance it has met. Pilger has made over fifty documentaries and
is the
author, most recently, of "Freedom
Next Time: Resisting the
Empire," which
looks at ongoing struggles in Afghanistan, Diego Garcia, India,
Palestine,
and South Africa. Pilger joins us for the hour to play excerpts of
his
documentaries and speak of the struggles he has covered. *
Dark Ages America, the Final Phase of Empire by Morris Berman. Like any
book at variance with the official story, this one has taken a lot
of hits. You need to read it for yourself to see the depth of
source material, the insight, and the poor outlook for the US
empire.